PER CURIAM.
We affirm, without comment, Appellant’s convictions for battery on a law enforcement officer (count 2) and resisting arrest with violence (count 3). We reverse the consecutive sentence imposed for conviction on count 3 because that offense arose out of the same criminal episode as count 2, and we remand for imposition of a concurrent sentence pursuant to Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993).
ZEHMER, C.J., and BOOTH and DAVIS, JJ., concur.