Neomar Resources Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp.

11CARTER, Judge,

concurs.

I respectfully concur.

Although I am in agreement with the majority’s treatment of this case, I write separately to make it clear that, in my opinion, the plugging of the well by defendants gained them very few or no benefits and cost plaintiffs several million dollars which they should not have had to expend. The equities are with the plaintiff, and the issues presented in this case should be addressed by the Louisiana legislature.