concurring.
I agree that the family court has jurisdiction to consider respondent’s rule for contempt. To interpret La.R.S. 13:1401 in a manner that would preclude the family court from having jurisdiction to enforce the terms of its own judgment, as suggested by relator, would deny the court authority granted to it by the constitution. Relator seeks, in essence, to inappropriately collaterally attack a judgment of the family court.