Appellant asserts, and the state agrees, that because the trial judge made contradictory oral pronouncements of sentence, remand is necessary in order to clarify the court’s intent. Although it appears that the judge may simply have misspoken in reiterating the sentence, in order to be certain, we remand to the lower court to clarify.
SENTENCE VACATED and REMANDED.
COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.