The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing evidence of collateral sex crimes where both the charged offenses and the collateral crimes occurred in a familial setting and where the collateral crimes were sufficiently similar to the charged offenses. See Saffor v. State, 660 So.2d 668, 672 (Fla.1995); Shipman v. State, 668 So.2d 313 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Affirmed.