We have for review Bemis v. State, 667 So.2d 779 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995), based on conflict with Salazar v. State, 665 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), quashed, 679 So.2d 1183 (Fla.1996). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We approve the result in Bemis based on Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla.1996).
It is so ordered.
KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.