Harrell v. State

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. However, as in Freeman v. State, 679 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), we certify to the supreme court the following question as one of great public importance: IS STATE v. GRAY, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1995), RETROACTIVE?

POLEN, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.