C.N. v. State

PER CURIAM.

C.N. appeals the final order of delinquency adjudicating him guilty of attempted burglary.- We reverse because the State failed to present evidence that was inconsistent with *299his reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla.1989); Luscomb v. State, 660 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); J.C.S. v. State, 613 So.2d 574 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

REVERSED.

GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur. W. SHARP, J., dissents, with opinion.