Boyne v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date filed: 1998-10-16
Citations: 728 So. 2d 246, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13267, 1998 WL 727407
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Lead Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Arthur William Boyne seeks a rehearing or rehearing en banc pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330(a) and 9.331(a). He argues that “this court has overlooked or misapprehended certain points of law or fact.” We have not. See Snell v. State, 522 So.2d 407 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

DENIED.

GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
HARRIS, J., concurs specially, with opinion.