Laidler v. State

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See C.L.B. v. State, 689 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (holding that respondent properly adjudicated delinquent for disorderly conduct where his nonverbal acts disturbed or interfered with an arrest); K.G. v. State, 338 So.2d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) (holding that arrest for disorderly conduct is not unconstitutional if person arrested obstructed officers’ execution of their legal duty, and was not based only on comments uttered).