J.M. v. State

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Miller v. State, 636 So.2d 144, 150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)(“[T]he question as to whether appellant had a specific intent to batter [the police officer] was a matter for the jury’s determination.”); Johnson v. State, 634 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)(circumstantial evidence is admissible to prove states of mind such as intent).