Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s June 10, 2003 order, *230and finding that the notice of appeal was not timely filed, the appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely.
ERVIN, PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s June 10, 2003 order, *230and finding that the notice of appeal was not timely filed, the appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely.
ERVIN, PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.