NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10095
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:19-cr-01164-JGZ-EJM-2
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JAMES COLE JACKSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2022**
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
James Cole Jackson appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 8-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Jackson’s counsel has filed
a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
as counsel of record. We have provided Jackson the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. See 18
U.S.C § 3583(e)(3); United States v. Henderson, 998 F.3d 1071, 1078 (9th Cir.
2021), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 810 (2022).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 22-10095