Benton, the county seat of Saline County, has been an incorporated town for many years, and was organized under the general statutes of the State, but the General Assembly of 1911 passed a special statute attempting to raise'its classification so as to constitute it a city of the second class. It was decided, however, by this court that the special statute was void for the reason that it constituted a violation of those sections of the constitution which provide that “the General Assembly shall pass no special act conferring corporate power,” except in certain instances, and that the General Assembly.“shall provide by general laws for the organization of cities and incorporated towns.” Art. XII, Sections 2 and 3, Constitution of 1874. Cotten v. City of Benton, 117 Ark. 190.
The decision declaring the special statute void was rendered by this court on February 22, 1915, and the General Assembly enacted a statute, which was approved March 23, 1915 (Act No. 212, page 831, Acts of 1915), attempting to ratify and validate all acts performed by municipalities under special statutes raising their grades, and also confirming in office the de facto officers in those municipalities until an election could be held to elect their successors. The statute, after a recital in the preamble to the effect that the grade of many incorporated towns had been raised by acts of the Legislature to cities of the second class, and that the Supreme Court had held that all such special statutes were void, reads as follows:
“Section 1. It is declared that the constituted govments of municipalities, which the Legislature has dedared to be dties of the second class, have been and are the de facto governments of such municipalities, and all their acts heretofore done, which would be valid if they were cities of the second class, or which would be valid if they were incorporated towns, are hereby ratified and confirmed, and declared to be valid as the acts of de facto governments; and, inasmuch as some time must elapse before a government can be organized in such municipalities as incorporated towns, the present officers of such municipalities are hereby confirmed in office until their successors are elected and qualified, and are hereby declared to be the de facto and de jure officers of said municipalities, and all their acts as such shall be valid until their successors have been elected and qualified in the manner hereinafter provided.”
The second section of the statute directed the Governor, at the earliest practical date, to call a special election in all such municipalities for the purpose of electing a mayor, recorder, and five aldermen as the officers of said municipalities as incorporated towns. The section also provided how the election should be held, and the returns thereof made and declared, etc. The statute" contained an emergency clause and therefore went into immediate effect.
On April 16, 1915, an ordinance was passed by the council creating an improvement district for the purpose of installing a system of water works, and appellees were appointed commissioners of the district, and on July 5, 1915, an ordinance was passed levying the assessments against the property in the district. The improvement was undertaken, and the assessments were levied, after obtaining the consent of the majority of the property owners of the district in accordance with the general statutes of this State with respect to improvement districts in cities and towns. Kirby’s Digest, section 5664, et seq.
The only thing urged as a defect in the organization of the district is that all acts of the city council of Benton were absolutely void and that the Legislature had no authority to validate any acts which had already been performed, nor to authorize any further acts to be performed by the city council. We need ndt concern ourselves at present with that part of the statute which undertook to validate acts which had already been performed by the council of Benton as a city of the second class, for, as has already been shown,' everything that was done affecting the organization of this improvement district was done after the passage of the statute, and we need ^ only consider that portion of the act which declared that “the present officers of such municipalities are hereby confirmed in office until their successors are elected and qualified, and are hereby declared to be the de facto and de jure officers of said municipalities, and all their acts as such shall be valid until their successors have been elected and qualified in the manner hereinafter provided.”
Appellant is a property owner in the improvement district, and undertakes to restrain the Board of Commissioners from issuing bonds and carrying forward the construction of the improvement. The creation of the improvement district was entirely within the statutory power of an incorporated town, as much so as within the powers of cities of either class, and the Legislature did not attempt to confer any new power in authorizing the council to perform acts for and on behalf of the incorporated town. The only constitutional limitation upon the creation of improvement districts in cities and towns is that the special assessments for local improvements must “be based upon the consent of a majority in value of the property holders owning property adjoining the locality to be affected,” and that“ such assessments shall, be ad valorem and uniform.” Art. XIX, Sec. 27.
Pursuant to that provision of the constitution, the Legislature provided by general laws for the organization of improvement districts in cities and towns, upon the consent being obtained of a majority in value of the owners of property to be affected. Nor is there any constitutional restriction upon the power of the Legislature with respect to determining how the corporate power conferred under general statutes shall be exercised, the only limitation being that contained in the two sections to the effect that the General Assembly shall provide by general laws for the organization of cities and towns, and that “the General Assembly shall pass no special act conferring corporate power.” All that the Legislature has done in the special ^ statute now under consideration, so far as it relates to the question before us, is to declare that the corporate functions, pursuant to the original organization of the incorporated Town of Benton, should be exercised by the officers elected for the municipality as a city of the second class, and we are of the opinion that that statute does no violence to the constitutional authority of the lawihakers.
It must be remembered that the incorporated town ceased to exercise its functions through the agencies then existing, when the General Assembly of 1911 passed the statute raising the municipality to a city of the second class. The terms of those officers had expired when the Act of 1915 was passed and at most they could only have been deemed as holding over until their' successors could be elected, and we see no constitutional objections to the Legislature providing other agencies, namely the officers which had been put into authority pursuant to the supposed power of the special act raising the municipality to that of a city of the second class, to execute the corporate authority until a new election could be held. The differences between the two classes of municipalities are purely statutory. An incorporated town has, under the statute, a mayor, a recorder and five aldermen, who constitute the city council, whereas the statute provides that the council of a city of the second class shall be composed of a mayor and two aldermen from each ward. While the members of the city council were elected under a void statute, and possessed no valid authority to act, yet it was within the province of the Legislature to authorize them to act for the incorporated town until the proper officers could be elected under general statutes. This was not an attempt to confer corporate authority by a special act. The authority was conferred under general statutes which provided for the organization of incorporated towns, and the Legislature in this special statute only designated the agencies through which that corporate power, which, had already been conferred, could be exercised.
We are of the opinion, therefore, that the acts of the city council in creating this improvement district and levying assessments, being acts that were performed subsequent to the passage of the statute of March 23, 1915, and before the election was held to elect new officers, it was a valid exercise of power, and that the improvement district has been legally created, and the assessments levied pursuant thereto are valid.
The chancellor was correct in his decree dismissing appellants’ complaint for want of equity, and the decree is therefore affirmed.