IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________
No. 95-60289
Summary Calendar
_______________
SHEILA BOWLES,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
(3:93 CV 825 BN)
_________________________
October 3, 1995
Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
In this case charging that she was terminated as a result of
race and sex discrimination, the plaintiff appeals a summary
judgment holding that she failed to establish a prima facie case.
In a comprehensive opinion, the district court carefully
explained that the plaintiff was totally unable to work because
of illness and thus could not satisfy the requirement, essential
*
Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no
precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-
settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens
on the legal profession." Pursuant to that rule, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published.
to establish a prima facie case, that she was able to perform the
work required of her. As the district court stated, this is
amply demonstrated by the record. Accordingly, and essentially
for the reasons set forth by the district court, the summary
judgment is AFFIRMED.
2