(concurring specialty)-
I concur in affirmance on the ground it cannot be error to omit instructions which involve nonexistent issues of fact. Lundin v. Stratmoen, 250 Minn. 555, 85 N.W.2d 828 (1957).
(concurring specialty)-
I concur in affirmance on the ground it cannot be error to omit instructions which involve nonexistent issues of fact. Lundin v. Stratmoen, 250 Minn. 555, 85 N.W.2d 828 (1957).