This is a petition for the writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to levy its annual estimates of the amount required for the maintenance of the public schools of the city of Detroit during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1891. In the annual report submitted by relator to the respondent, under the heading “For Maintenance,” appeared the following item: “Text-books, $15,000.” Under the heading “Estimated Receipts,” appeared the item, “For maintenance, $308,960 ”
Section 13, Act No. 331, Laws of 1873, provides that the board of education shall annually make an estimate of the amount of taxes deemed necessary for the ensuing or the current year, for all purposes of expenditure, and shall lay the same before the common council. It is' then made the duty of the common council to place upon' the tax rolls, and cause to be levied, the amount of such estimated expenditures, excepting for purchase of lots and erection of new buildings, with the necessary outhouses, fixtures, and furniture. The amount of this estimate and tax shall not be less than $4 for every child between the ages of 5 and 20 years, according to the last report on that subject. If such estimate exceeds $5 per capita, the council may approve or disapprove of such excess, or any part thereof.
The number of children was 63,009, and the per capita tax was fixed by the relator at $308,960, being the item above mentioned, for maintenance. The council, upon receiving the report, passed a resolution fixing and *550adopting the estimates reported by the relator. The council, on the next day after adopting the above resolution, submitted the estimates to the board of estimates of the city, which reduced the per capita tax to $298,-960. This action by the board of estimates was reported to the council, which adopted it, and ordered the various amounts to be assessed, levied, and collected as approved by the board of estimates. The item of $15,-000 was for free text-books, and was rejected by the board of estimates for that reason; but the board added $5,000 for text-books for poor children, though only $2,-000 had been required for that purpose the year previous. This $10,000 rejected is the sole source of the contention.
The first contention of the relator is that -the board of estimates has no supervisory power over the board of education funds, except that for purchasing lots and erecting school-houses, with the necessary out-buildings, fixtures, and furniture. In this contention it is correct. The board of estimates is limited in its jurisdiction to the several funds mentioned in the city charter. Act No. 488, Local Acts of 1887, chap. 8, § 4. The educational fund is not specified in the charter as among them. Act No. 424, Local .Acts of 1889. The only power of this board over this fund is limited to the estimates of the board of education for purchasing lots and erecting school-houses, with the outbuildings, fixtures, and furniture. Over these latter estimates the board of estimates has supervisory control. This is expressly conferred upon it by Act No. 331, Laws of 1873, which is amendatory of “An act relative to free schools in the city of Detroit.
The second contention of relator is that, inasmuch as the amount asked for by it, and reported to the council, was within the five-dollar limit, the only power vested in the council was to order the tax placed upon the tax rolls and levied, regardless of the fact that some of the *551items included in the estimates are illegal. We cannot agree with the relator in this contention. If any of the items are clearly illegal, it is the right, not only, but the duty, of the council, to reject them, and refuse to.spread them upon the rolls. The council cannot interfere with the discretion of the board of education, and can only reject such items as are clearly illegal. We do not regard the first resolution of the council, approving the estimates, as final. The final resolution was the one approving the report of the board of estimates, and ordering the amount therein specified to be levied. This resolution was inconsistent with the first, and operated to repeal it. We must therefore determine whether the item for free text-books is legal.
It has never been claimed, so far as we are aware, that school boards had the power to furnish free text-books except by virtue of special legislation. That this has been the common understanding is evidenced by the fact that this power has been specially conferred upon some municipal corporations, and the policy of its general adoption has been discussed in the Legislature, and bills have been introduced for that purpose. Such a bill was passed in 1889. Act No. 147, Laws of 1889. By section 6 of this act, it is provided that school-districts in cities organized under special charters shall be exempt from the provisions of the act unless the boards are authorized to proceed under it by a majority vote of the qualified electors of such districts. No such vote has been obtained, and the relator has taken no steps to submit the question to a vote of the electors. Its action, therefore, in providing for free text-books, was absolutely void. But whether the common council properly exercised its power or not is, in fact, immaterial. The writ of mandamus cannot be invoked to assist in the enforcement of a claim which is illegal.
*552The writ must be denied, with costs to the respondent.
The other Justices concurred.