(concurring). Because we are not convinced that the rule in Feldman v Monroe Township Board, 51 Mich App 752; 216 NW2d 628 (1974), lv den 391 Mich 837 (1974), should be repudiated, this concurring opinion is written.
We therefore reverse on the basis of Feldman and adopt the first paragraph of our brother’s, Judge Raymond L. Smith, opinion. We deem that any change in the rule laid down in Feldman should come from the Legislature or the Supreme Court.