(concurring). I concur in Judge Walsh’s opinion and write only to add two recent cases wherein the reversibly inconsistent rule is criticized. These are People v Allen, 94 Mich App 539; 288 NW2d 451 (1980) (Danhof, C.J., dissenting), and People v Lewis, 94 Mich App 752; 290 NW2d 73 (1980) (M. J. Kelly, J., dissenting).