UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1217
RAYMOND A. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HENDRICK AUTOMOTIVE GROUP; HENDRICK HONDA,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 12-1241
RAYMOND A. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HENDRICK AUTOMOTIVE GROUP; HENDRICK HONDA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:10-cv-00109-FDW); Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:11-cv-00389-FDW-DCK)
Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Matthew Keen,
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated cases, Raymond A. Johnson
appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment on
his employment discrimination claims, denying his motions to
reconsider, and dismissing identical employment discrimination
claims as barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the records
and find no reversible error or evidence of judicial bias.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Johnson v. Hendrick Auto. Group, No. 3:10-cv-00109-FDW
(W.D.N.C. May 3, 2011, Dec. 5, 2011, & Feb. 16,
2012); Johnson v. Hendrick Auto. Group, No. 3:11-cv-00389-FDW-
DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2012). We deny Johnson’s motions for the
preparation of transcripts at government expense and to
reconsider the order consolidating his appeals. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3