(specially concurring).
I agree that this cause should be reversed and remanded, but I disagree with the majority opinion that the defendant was not entitled to a manslaughter instruction *238in this case. I think the jury under the testimony would have been justifiable in believing that the deceased, by interfering with the domestic affairs of the appellant, provoked the appellant to kill him in the heat of passion.
'Ethridge, J., concurs in the view herein expressed.