NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE MIKE O’DONNELL and ANDREW CAMERON
____________________
2011-1610
(Serial No. 09/245,798)
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
TIMOTHY E. SIEGEL, Timothy E. Siegel Patent Law,
PLLC, of Bellevue, Washington, argued for appellants.
FARHEENA Y. RASHEED, Associate Solicitor, Office of
the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on
the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor and JOSEPH G.
PICCOLO, Associate Solicitor.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (BRYSON, DYK, and MOORE, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 11, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk