Paine v. Cason

               United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Seventh Circuit
                            Chicago, Illinois 60604
                                  May 17, 2012


                                     Before

                           FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

                           RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

                           ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge



No. 10-1487                                            Appeal from the United
                                                       States District Court for the
KATHLEEN PAINE, as guardian of the estate of           Northern District of Illinois,
Christina Rose Eilman,                                 Eastern Division.
       Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                                       No. 06 C 3173
                    v.                                 Virginia M. Kendall, Judge.

RICHARD CASON, et al.,
     Defendants-Appellants.



                                     Order

      The slip opinion of this court issued on April 26, 2012, is amended as
follows:

             1. The sentence at 19 reading "Actually they were for the control of
      her bipolar disorder.” is changed to “Yet they may have been for the
      control of her bipolar disorder.”

            2. The sentence at 21 reading "Sharon Stokes, a detention aide at the
      Second District, inventoried Eilman’s possessions and found the
      psychotropic medication.” is changed to "Sharon Stokes, a detention aide
No. 10-1487                                                                   Page 2

       at the Second District, inventoried Eilman’s possessions and found some
       medication, which may have been for control of her mental condition.”

       Defendants-appellants filed a petition for rehearing on May 9, 2012 and
plaintiff-appellee filed a petition for rehearing on May 11, 2012. All of the judges
on the panel have voted to deny the petition for rehearing filed by the
defendants-appellants. A majority of the judges on the panel have voted to deny
the petition for rehearing filed by the plaintiff-appellee. Judge Rovner voted to
grant this petition. The petitions for rehearing are therefore DENIED.