delivered the opinion of the court.
This was a suit by attachment, brought before a justice of the peace. Judgment being rendered for the plaintiff, the defendant took his appeal to the Circuit Court, where the defendant filed a plea in the nature of a plea in abatement, putting in issue the truth of the affidavit upon which the attachment was predicated. Plaintiff moved to strike out the plea upon the ground that the defendant, by pleading to the merits in the justice’s court, had waived his right to plead in abatement; but the court overruled the motion, and this is the only ground of error assigned in this court. If the suit had been instituted in the Circuit Court, and the defendant in his answer had plead both in abatement and in bar to the merits of the action, the plea in bar would undoubtedly have been a waiver of his right to plead in abatement; but, with reference to appeals from justices of the peace, our statute requires that the appellate court shall proceed to hear, try, and determine the same anew. It is true that the cause of action cannot be changed, but the defendant is by no means limited or confined to the same defence set up before the justice. It is a trial de novo, and his pleading to the merits before the justice did not waive his right to plead in abatement in the Circuit Court.
Let the judgment be affirmed;
the other judges concurring.