United States v. Ronda Bird

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 18 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-30198 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:10-cr-00102-SEH v. MEMORANDUM * RONDA RENEE BIRD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding ** Submitted May 15, 2012 Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Ronda Renee Bird appeals from the 37-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for involuntary manslaughter, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153(a) and 1112(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm. Bird contends that the government breached the plea agreement by failing to move for a third point for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b). Under the terms of the plea agreement, the government was not obligated to move for the third point if Bird acted in any way that was inconsistent with acceptance of responsibility. The record reflects that the government had an adequate basis to decline to move for the third point. Accordingly, it did not breach the plea agreement. See United States v. Cannel, 517 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir. 2008) ("Because the government was obligated to move for the reduction only if [the defendant] met the specified conditions, and because there is no suggestion that it acted based on unconstitutional or arbitrary motives, the government did not breach the plea agreement by not recommending an adjustment for acceptance of responsibility.") (footnote omitted). AFFIRMED. 2 11-30198