[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 11-15632 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar MAY 24, 2012
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 2:05-cr-00458-IPJ-PWG-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL DEANGELO GRIFFIN,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(May 24, 2012)
Before MARCUS, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Griffin, proceeding pro se, appeals the denial of his motion for a
sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). On June 15, 2006, Griffin was
sentenced to sixty-three months imprisonment for one count of possession of
cocaine base with intent to distribute. On March 6, 2009, that sentence was
reduced to the statutory mandatory minimum of sixty months imprisonment. On
August 22, 2011, Griffin filed a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), seeking a
further reduction in his sentence. On November 10, 2011, the district court denied
that motion.
On appeal, Griffin argues that a reduction in his sentence is warranted in
light of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Our precedent, however,
makes it clear that a defendant cannot obtain a sentence reduction under Section
3582(c)(2) if his sentence is already at the statutory mandatory minimum. See
United States v. Mills, 613 F.3d 1070, 1077–78 (11th Cir. 2010). Griffin also
asserts that the district court should have granted his Section 3582(c)(2) motion by
affording him safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). Our precedent also
forecloses this suggestion. See United States v. Jackson, 613 F.3d 1305, 1308
(11th Cir. 2010) (holding that “the safety-valve is inapplicable to sentence-
modification proceedings” under Section 3582(c)(2)).
For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
AFFIRMED.
2