Glenn Allen Corbett v. Rodney McAbee

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 11-14381 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JUNE 1, 2012 ________________________ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 5:09-cv-00362-RBP GLENN ALLEN CORBETT, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RODNEY MCABEE, RICK BROWN, Madison County Sheriff Deputies, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ________________________ (June 1, 2012) Before WILSON, JORDAN, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Glenn Corbett, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court dismissed Corbett’s complaint for failure to comply with discovery obligations and court orders. On appeal, Corbett argues the merits of his claim instead of any reversible error in the district court’s dismissal. We typically review dismissal of a complaint for abuse of discretion. Equity Lifestyle Props., Inc. v. Fla. Mowing & Landscape Serv., Inc., 556 F.3d 1232, 1240 n.14 (11th Cir. 2009). However, issues not briefed on appeal by a pro se litigant are deemed abandoned. Timson v. Sampson, 518 F.3d 870, 874 (11th Cir. 2008) (per curiam). Here, construing Corbett’s brief liberally, he has not even tangentially argued error in the district court’s grounds for dismissing his complaint. Having not addressed it, Corbett has abandoned the issue of the district court’s dismissal, which is the only ruling on appeal. AFFIRMED. 2