UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7738
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLEMENTINE BULLOCK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon,
Senior District Judge. (3:10-cr-00032-NKM-11)
Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 5, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clementine Bullock, Appellant Pro Se. Elliott J. Casey, Joseph
D. Platania, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Ronald
Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney,
Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Clementine Bullock appeals the district court’s orders
denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction
in her sentence based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines Manual (2010) and reconsideration of that order. We
have reviewed the record and hold the district court did not
abuse its discretion in denying the relief Bullock sought. See
United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 186 (4th Cir. 2010)
(stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court in its order denying
reconsideration. See United States v. Bullock, No. 3:10-cr-
00032-NKM-11 (W.D. Va. filed Nov. 17, 2011 & entered Nov. 18,
2011; Dec. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2