UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6310
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY HATCHES, a/k/a Jameel Smith, a/k/a Anthony Dove,
a/k/a Ant Hatches, a/k/a Anthony Farvey,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K.
Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00058-NKM-1)
Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Hatches, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Mitchell Huber,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia; Jeb
Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Hatches appeals the district court’s orders
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B) (2006) motion and motion
for reconsideration. We grant Hatches’ motion to file
supplemental briefs. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Hatches, No.
3:02-cr-00058-NKM-1 (W.D. Va. Feb. 1 & 15, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The district court did not have authority to grant the
motion to reconsider, because a motion to reconsider is not a
proper vehicle to seek review of a ruling on a § 3582 motion.
United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010).
2