UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6166
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
REGINALD BOONE, a/k/a Reggie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (2:92-cr-00113-2)
Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Boone appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction
in his sentence based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines Manual (2010). We conclude that the district court
properly determined that Boone was ineligible for a sentence
reduction because his sentencing range was determined by his
career offender designation, not a calculation of the drug
quantity attributable to Boone, and thus was not impacted by
Amendment 750. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187
(4th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Boone, No. 2:92-cr-
00113-2 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 5, 2012 & entered Jan. 9, 2012).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2