United States v. Michael Burgess

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JUNE 7, 2012 No. 11-15828 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-00161-ACC-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL FRANK BURGESS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (June 7, 2012) Before HULL, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Sean M. Wagner, counsel for Michael Frank Burgess in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Burgess’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Accordingly, Burgess’s motion for leave to file a pro se supplemental brief is DENIED. 2