This case involves tbe same issues as the case of City of St. Louis, Respondent, v. United Railways Company, Appellant, numbered 17254, decided at 'this term. The judgment, therefore, in the instant case (No. 17579) is affirmed, and it is so ordered.
Lamm, G. J., and Woodson and Brown, JJ., concur. Graves, J., dissents in a separate opinion filed in No. 17254, in which Bond and Faris, JJ., concur.