This case involves the same issues and is controlled by like principles of law declared by this court in City of St. Louis, Respondent, v. United Railways Company, Appellant, numbered 17254, decided at this term, therefore, the judgment in this case (No. 17525) is affirmed, and it is so ordered.
Lamm, G. J., and Woodson and Brotvn, JJ., concur. Graves, J., dissents in a separate opinion filed in No. 17254, in which Bond and Paris, JJ., concur.