Stephens v. Gordon

CONCURRING OPINION.

BOND, J.

The act being unambiguous is self-interpretative, and constituted, in my judgment, no ground for this proceeding, of which, from the record, I am unable to take any other view than that it is a “moot” case of which this court should not have taken any cognizance and which should not have been presented to it.

I concur in the result of the learned majority opinion.