UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6816
JAMES A. HENSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT LIKIN; SERGEANT MERLIN; CO/2 J. YOMMER; CO/2 V.
LARK; CO/2 B. WILBURN; CO/2 G. WILSON; CO/2 HENDRICKS; CO/2
S. A. WILSON; CO/2 M. E. RANDALL; CO/2 W. L. LOGSON;
LIEUTENANT R. M. FRIEND; SERGEANT W. E. MILLER; CO/2 D.
KRAMPF; CO/2 JESSE HENDERSON; CO/2 WAGNER; LIEUTENANT J.
JOHNSON; SERGEANT J. KRUMPACH; SERGEANT S. E. ENGLE,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,
Party-in-Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:11-
cv-02719-RWT)
Submitted: June 14, 2012 Decided: June 20, 2012
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A. Henson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
James A. Henson, Jr. seeks to appeal the district
court’s potential dismissal of his action. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Henson has not
sought to appeal any order but instead filed a conditional
notice of appeal in the event that the district court rules
unfavorably in his action. Thus, there is neither a final order
nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3