On October 9,1990, the Defendant was sentenced to Count I, twenty (20) years for Sexual Intercourse without Consent; Count II, twenty (20) years for Sexual Intercourse without Consent; said sentences shall be served concurrently; 214 days credit for time served. The defendant shall not be eligible for parole until he has completed the sexual offender treatment program at Montana State Prison; plus $20 surcharge.
On July 24,1992, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The Defendant was present and was represented by Roberta Hoe, Legal Intern from the Montana Defender Project. The state was not represented.
*32DATED this 24th day of July, 1992.Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
The reason for the decision is the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct pursuant to Section 46-18-904(3), MCA. The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to deem inadequate or excessive as required to overcome the presumption per Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
Hon. Ed McLean, Chairman, Hon. Thomas M. McKittrick, Hon. G. Todd Baugh, Judges.The Sentence Review Board wishes thank Roberta Hoe, Legal Intern from the Montana Defender Project for her assistance to the defendant and to this Court.