State v. Gumness

On January 22,1990, the Defendant was sentenced to forty (40) years for Mitigated Deliberate Homicide; credit is given for 35 days time served.

On August 20,1992, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and represented himself. The state was represented by Karen Townsend, Deputy County Attorney from Missoula.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division is here to consider the sentence which was imposed by Judge Henson. *44This board has the authority to increase the sentence, to leave it as is, or to reduce it. In the event that the Board would decide the alternative to increase the sentence, the proceedings will be stayed, an attorney would be appointed, and the proceedings would be rescheduled for a later date. In the event that the Board determines the sentence will remain as is or reduce it, the Board will go ahead with that decision. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

DATED this 20th day of August, 1992.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence imposed by Judge Henson shall be affirmed.

The reason for the decision is the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct pursuant to Section 46-18-904(3), MCA. The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to deem inadequate or excessive as required to overcome the presumption per Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

Hon. Ed McLean, Chairman, Hon. Thomas M. McKittrick, and Hon. G. Todd Baugh, Judges.

The Sentence Review Board wishes to thank Mr. Gumness for appearing pro se. They also wish to thank Karen Townsend for appearing on behalf of the State of Montana.