On January 5,1994, the Defendant was sentenced to 20 years on each count, with 10 years suspended on each count for the offense of Burglary (2 Counts), a felony. Those two sentences to be served concurrently. The suspended portion will be suspended upon the conditions listed in the January 5,1994 Judgment. Credit is given of 49 days for time served in jail prior to sentencing.
On May 6,1994, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The Defendant was present and proceeded pro se. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.
The reason for the decision is the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct pursuant to Section 46-18-904(3), MCA. The Division finds that the *49reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to deem inadequate or excessive as required to overcome the presumption per Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
DATED this 6th day of May, 1994. Hon. G. Todd Baugh, Chairman, Hon. John Warner and Hon. Ted Lympus, Members.The Sentence Review Board wishes to thank Victor Sebastian for representing himself in this matter.