Steven Tarpley v. J. Stouffer

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7498 STEVEN E. TARPLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner; DAVID BARTHALOW; FREDERICK J. NASTRI; ALBERT EARL DAVIS; JON GALLEY; BOBBY SHEARIN; FRANK BISHOP, JR.; DONALD CROWE; DOUGLAS DEVORE; TINNELE WINTERS; ROBERT M. FRIEND; KETTERMAN, Lt.; O. W. CREEK; W. D. SLATE; ROBERT HUFF; B. A. WILT; JOHN DOE, Sgt., H.U.-4; M. B. GARRISON; S. WINEBRENNER; JEFFREY SHIMKO; JEREMY LINABURG; R. GOVER; R. GRAHAM; O. K. BERRY; JAMES BEEMAN; R. SHIELDS; R. GOSS; MILANEY LILLER; CHARLENE HETTY TRENUM; BARBARA NEWLON; ISAIS TESSEMA; KATHLEEN GREENE, Warden; BRUCE BOZMAN; LT. GALLIGHER, Lt.; MAYCOCK, Maj.; TYLER, Capt., Mailroom Supervisor; PERSINGER; SCOTT S. OAKLEY, Mr. - Executive Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. (1:10-cv-02140-BEL) Submitted: June 21, 2012 Decided: June 25, 2012 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven E. Tarpley, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Steven E. Tarpley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tarpley v. Stouffer, No. 1:10-cv-02140-BEL (D. Md. Oct. 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3