State v. Stinson

The Defendant was sentenced for COUNT I: ASSAULT ON A PEACE OFFICER, a felony, in violation of Section 45-5-210, MCA, committed to Ten (10) years to the Department of Corrections, with Five (5) years suspended; and COUNT II: ASSAULT ON A PEACE OFFICER, a felony, in violation of Section 45-5-210, MCA, committed to Five (5) years to the Department of Corrections, with all time suspended, to run consecutive to COUNT I and any other sentence the Defendant is currently serving; and other terms and conditions as given in the Sentence on January 10, 2007.

On August 1,2013, the Defendant’s Application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court (hereafter “the Division”).

The Defendant was present and was represented by Ed Sheehy, Jr., Attorney at Law. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the Application, the Defendant was advised that the Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The Defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Division. The Defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

*67DATED this 26th day of September, 2013.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that, “The sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (Section 46-18-904(3), MCA)

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the sentence shall be AFFIRMED.

Done in open Court this 1st day of August, 2013.

Chairperson, Hon. Loren Tucker, Member Hon. Brad Newman and Member Hon. Kathy Seeley.