United States v. Jamar Belin

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 29 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10543 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:03-cr-00350-LRH v. MEMORANDUM * JAMAR BELIN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 26, 2012 ** Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges. Jamar Belin appeals from the eight-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Belin contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because his supervised release violations were technical and he had shown improvement with his drug abuse. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), the within-Guidelines sentence is reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). AFFIRMED. 2 11-10543