A and S Engineering Services v. Frydoun Sheikhpour

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 05 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., a corporation, No. 11-57201 Defendant-counter-claimant - D.C. No. 2:11-cv-02776-PSG-AGR Appellant, v. MEMORANDUM * FRYDOUN SHEIKHPOUR, AKA Fred Sheikhpour, an individual, Defendant-cross-defendant, and A AND S ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., a California corporation, DBA A & S Engineering, Inc., Plaintiff-cross-defendant, and HABIB AMERICAN BANK, Cross-defendant - Appellee., LOS ANGELES COUNTY TAX * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. COLLECTOR; et al., Cross-defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 26, 2012 ** Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS and GOULD, Circuit Judges. Appellant Chevron U.S.A. Inc., a corporation, appeals the district court’s denial of its request for preliminary injunctive relief against appellee Habib American Bank. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir. 2008); see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 129 S. Ct. 365, 374 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review). AFFIRMED. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 11-57201