Case: 11-16073 Date Filed: 07/12/2012 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-16073
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-03261-CAP
CORINA GARCIA ALBARRAN,
MARIA LOURDES SEGOBIANO-DE SOTO,
LUIS MAGANA, individually and on behalf of
a class of others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
DIRECTOR, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT,
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF DRIVER SERVICES,
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,
CHAIR, COBB COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS,
SHERIFF, COBB COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
Defendants-Appellees.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Georgia
_________________________
(July 12, 2012)
Before EDMONDSON, WILSON, and HILL, Circuit Judges.
Case: 11-16073 Date Filed: 07/12/2012 Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Corina Garcia Albarran, Maria Lourdes Segobiano-DeSoto, and Luis
Magana appeal the dismissal of this action against John Morton, Greg Dozier, Tim
Lee and Neil Warren for declaratory and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs sought to
have certain agreements between United States Immigration and Customs
Enforcement and local Georgia law enforcement agencies declared
unconstitutional and permanently enjoined.
The defendants moved to dismiss, asserting, inter alia, that plaintiffs had no
standing to bring this action because they could not meet the injury-in-fact
requirement by showing an imminent risk of future harm to them. The district
court agreed and dismissed the case. Plaintiffs filed this appeal.
We have carefully reviewed the briefs and record in this case. We have also
examined the district court’s opinion in which it thoughtfully and completely
considered whether plaintiffs could show the requisite injury-in-fact for standing.
We agree with the district court that plaintiffs have not made that showing. Since
we find no legal error in the district court’s opinion and agree with its analysis and
conclusions on this issue, we shall affirm the judgment of the district court on the
basis of that opinion. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court dismissing
this case is
AFFIRMED.
2