HLD-176 (August 2011) NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-3055
___________
IN RE: GEORGE P. JOHNSON, Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the District of Delaware
(Related to D. Del. Civ. No. 1-09-cv-00619)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
August 25, 2011
Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, ALDISERT and WEIS, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: July 23, 2012)
_________
OPINION
_________
PER CURIAM
George P. Johnson filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we direct
the District Court to rule on a petition that he had filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
The District Court has since ruled on Johnson’s § 2254 petition. In light of the District
Court’s action, the question Johnson presented is no longer a live controversy, so we will
deny his mandamus petition as moot. See, e.g., Lusardi v. Xerox Corp., 975 F.2d 964,
974 (3d Cir. 1992).