FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 26 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHRISTOPHER LEE JENKINS, No. 10-56448
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:09-cv-00116-L-BLM
v.
MEMORANDUM *
R. J. DONOVAN; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
M. James Lorenz, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 17, 2012 **
Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Christopher Lee Jenkins appeals pro se from the
district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging civil
rights violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to comply with court orders, Ferdik v.
Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992), and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action
without prejudice because Jenkins failed to comply with its order requiring him to
file a second amended complaint, after the court had already granted Jenkins three
other extensions and warned Jenkins that no further extensions would be granted
absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. Id. at F.2d at 1260-61 (listing
factors to consider).
Jenkins’s request that this court provide him with copies of “the blank
informal appellants opening brief” and “the actual complaint on appeal” is denied
as moot.
AFFIRMED.
2 10-56448