UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6478
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BARRY LEWIS MATTHEWS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. James C. Turk, Senior
District Judge. (6:94-cr-70077-JCT-1)
Submitted: July 26, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry Lewis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Barry Lewis Matthews appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and a subsequent order denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Matthews, No. 6:94-cr-
70077-JCT-1 (W.D. Va. Mar. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The district court did not have authority to grant the
motion to reconsider, because a motion to reconsider is not a
proper vehicle to seek review of a ruling on a § 3582 motion.
United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235–36 (4th Cir. 2010).
2