UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6452
UNULA BOO SHAWN ABEBE, a/k/a Unula B Abebe,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT SCOTT; KAREN MCCULLOUGH; SHARONDA SUTTON;
LIEUTENANT HUDSON; KENNETH PARKER; ROBERT STEVENSON; LULA
JOHNSON; AL WALKER; NURSE JOHNSON; LIEUTENANT S. JACKSON;
PERCY JONES; LIEUTENANT CARTER; SOUTH CAROLINA; WILLIE
SIMMONS; LIEUTENANT T JOHNSON; SERGEANT DEVON SCOTT;
SERGEANT FOGAL; SERGEANT H WRIGHT; SERGEANT J C WILLIAMS;
SERGEANT GLASS; SERGEANT OAKMAN; SERGEANT R JONES;
LIEUTENANT FALEY; CORPORAL FURGAL; CORPORAL DOOLEY; CORPORAL
COREY BECKETT; LARRY CATLIDGE; JERMAINE MCCOY; JOHN ENGLISH;
CLIFTON DAVENPORT; M BRADY; OFFICER MCDANIELS; OFFICER COX;
OFFICER STONE; OFFICER SOREZ; OFFICER ROBERTS; OFFICER
BROWN; JOHN IRMO; J DIXON; T EDMOND; CORPORAL MANLEY;
OFFICER HAMLETON; OFFICER MOSES; ROSELYN ELERBY; ANN
HALLMAN; INVESTIGATOR HURT; SERGEANT T ESTERLINE; OFFICER
WILLIAMS; LIEUTENANT R JEFFERSON; AARON WILSON; OFFICER
FANT; OFC HARDY; OFC GRITTLE; OFFICER MS COOK; OFFICER MR
COOK; OFC DICKSON; DOCTOR JOHN B. TOMARCHIO; WILLIAM BYARS;
MAURICE GREEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Kaymani Daniels West, Magistrate
Judge. (5:11-cv-02750-MBS-KDW)
Submitted: July 26, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unula Boo Shawn Abebe, Appellant Pro Se. Mason Abram Summers,
RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Unula Boo Shawn Abebe seeks to appeal the magistrate
judge’s text order denying his motions for judicial notice and
for relief from order. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Abebe seeks to appeal is
neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction and deny as moot Abebe’s motion for hearing en
banc. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
3