UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6074
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
THOMAS WILLIAMS, a/k/a Ty,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (4:95-cr-00001-CMC-1)
Submitted: July 30, 2012 Decided: August 3, 3012
Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Lee Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant
United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Lee Williams appeals the district court’s orders
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a
sentence reduction and motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the denial of Williams’ § 3582(c)(2) motion for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams,
No. 4:95-cr-00001-CMC-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 5, 2011). Because the
district court lacked the authority to consider Williams’ motion
to reconsider, see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233,
235-36 (4th Cir. 2010), we affirm the district court’s denial of
relief. We deny Williams’ motion to reconsider the denial of
his motion to extend the filing time for his informal brief
and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2