UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1620
In re: LINWOOD GRAY; DARRELL BRACEY,
Petitioners.
On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus.
(8:94-cr-00241-DKC)
Submitted: June 29, 2012 Decided: August 3, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Linwood Gray; Darrell Bracey, Petitioners Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Linwood Gray and Darrell Bracey petition for a writ of
mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed
ruling on their Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider the
denial of their 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion and
also delayed ruling on their motion for recusal. They seek an
order from this court directing the district court to act. Our
review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district
court has recently entered an order denying the Petitioners’
motions. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2