UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6851
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TIMNAH RUDISILL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:01-cr-00048-MR-9; 1:05-cv-00212-MR)
Submitted: August 22, 2012 Decided: August 27, 2012
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timnah K. Rudisill, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Amy
Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jill
Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Timnah Rudisill appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to amend his previously filed Fed. R. Civ. P.
60(b) motion. As noted by the district court, it could not
allow Rudisill to amend his Rule 60(b) motion as the motion was
no longer pending. The Rule 60(b) motion had been denied in
December 2008. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Rudisill, Nos. 1:01-cr-
00048-MR-9; 1:05-cv-00212-MR (W.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2